fbpx

Core web vitals from Google are the new ranking signal in the town that are expected to arrive with full force in 2021. They will join the “page experience signal” to promote the websites for developing better user experience characteristics like mobile-friendliness, loading speed, and more.

But before taking a deep dive into the core web vitals, it’s important to have a quick understanding of the page experience signals first to develop a better picture of the main purpose.

“The role of page experience signals is to evaluate and measure the experience of users while interacting with a website page.”

The data collected through page experience signals can be analyzed and put into action and optimize your site for improved performance. Your users will have a seamless experience while browsing around the website. It’s a great way for a business to strengthen its bond with the target audience and build long-lasting and trustworthy relationships. However, these signals are not only for relationship building. Websites that take effective actions from page experience signal metrics will also have a better chance to shine in the search results (SEO) because Google intends to create an improved web experience environment for the site users.

The page experience signal metrics are taken into account when it comes to ranking a website on Google search engine result pages. As of now, the “page experience signal” includes the following metrics:

  • Mobile-friendliness
  • Secure browsing
  • HTTPS-security
  • Intrusive interstitial

If necessary, implementations are observed to improve the position of these above metrics for a website, then it will help to push the URL to a more competitive spot on the search engine result pages.

However, these metrics are not detailed or comprehensive which means that sometimes they do not provide a clear direction to the website owners. Core web vitals fill this gap as they are more detailed and provide actionable insight. So, how do core web vitals work and how can they help the websites? Let’s find it out.

Understanding Core Web Vitals

Core web vitals are not a new category of ranking signal, but an addition to Google’s existing ranking factor – “page experience signal.” The core web vitals will stage the page experience signal to the next level with its informative metrics and help the owners, developers, or marketers to navigate the opportunities for the improvement of website experience.

So, the three core web vitals are as follows:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)
  • FID (First Input Delay)
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

The usual speed measurement metrics like Time to First Byte (TTFB) or First Contextual Paint (FCP) are not the most effective ways for highlighting the web pages’ speed because they don’t correspond to what a user sees on the screen while interacting with the page. When it comes to website speed, then what matters the most is how much time it takes for a user to interact with the largest contents of the page. This is where LCP comes to the rescue.

LCP measures the time a web page takes to load from the users’ perspective. In other words, it determines the time consumed for loading the largest content (text, image, or video block) on the screen right after the user has requested the URL.

So, how do you know if the LCP score of the website is good, average, or bad? According to the specific LCP guidelines of Google, the LCP speed of the website can be categorized into any of the following three ratings:

  • Good (if the largest content on the page loads within 2.5 seconds)
  • Needs Improvement (if the largest content on the page takes more than 2.5 seconds but less than 4 seconds to load) Poor (if the largest content on the page takes more than 4 seconds to load)

Source: web.dev

So, Google is saying that a website’s goal should be to hit the LCP within 2.5 seconds for every page that it has.

FID (First Input Delay)

First Input Delay (FID) is one of the other core web vitals that calculates the time taken by the website to respond to the interaction request of the user. These interactions with a website can be anything like- selecting an option from the menu, putting the email address into a field, choosing the newsletter subscription offer, etc.

So, how do you know if the FID score of the website is good or not? According to the specific FID guidelines of Google, the FID speed of the website can be categorized into any of the following three:

  • Good (If the site response time is less than 100 milliseconds)
  • Needs Improvement (If the site response time is more than 100 milliseconds but less than 300 milliseconds)
  • Poor (If the site response time is more than 300 milliseconds)

Source: web.dev

FID measures the time it takes to do something on a web page, therefore, it’s also a speed score. Although it goes one step beyond purely speed scoring as it evaluates the time consumed for the users to execute something on the website.

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

An unexpected change in the web page layout leads to a very bad user experience. For example, if a user is reading a blog on a website but the text shifts to another place without any warning, then it will create an annoying experience for the users. Also, the unexpected movement can happen for not only text but for other elements on the page also such as links, images, fields, or call-to-action buttons. It’s terrible for the reputation of the website. That’s why it’s important that such issues related to the unexpected movement of content are resolved.

In this endeavor, the third of the core web vitals, Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), is here to guide because it evaluates how often such unexpected movements are experienced by the users. CLS calculates the stability of a web page layout.

So, how does one know if the CLS score of the website is good or not? According to the specific CLS guidelines of Google, the CLS score of the website can be categorized, into, not surprisingly:

  • Good (If the CLS score is less than 0.1)
  • Needs Improvement (if the CLS score is more than 0.1 but less than 0.25)
  • Poor (if the CLS score is more than 0.25) CLS-Cumulative-Layout-Shift-Ranges

So, if a website wants to present a good user experience, then it should have a CLS score of less than 0.1.

Tools for Measuring Core Web Vitals

There are six tools from Google as of now that can help in measuring core web vitals. These tools are easy to use and allow quick evaluation of the LCP, FID, and CLS position of the website. Check them out below:

[PageSpeed Insights](https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/) [Lighthouse](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/lighthouse/blipmdconlkpinefehnmjammfjpmpbjk) [Chrome UX Report](https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-user-experience-report/) [Chrome DevTools](https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2020/05/devtools#cls) [Web Vitals Extension](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/web-vitals/ahfhijdlegdabablpippeagghigmibma) [Search Console](https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-vitals)

Source: web.dev

PageSpeed Insights: Anybody can visit the PageSpeed Insights tool, insert the web page URL, and click on the “analyze” button. That’s it. In just three easy steps, the core web vitals data will be generated for both web and mobile interface along with the suggestions that can help to improve the page experience.

Lighthouse: The lighthouse extension for Google Chrome can be downloaded to generate the core web vitals information. It was recently updated to version 6.0 that has introduced additional audits and new metrics like TBT for a detailed diagnosis of web page performance. It also helps in providing opportunities to reform the UX of the website.

Chrome UX Report: Chrome UX report, also known as CrUX is a public dataset that has been made from various samples collected from chrome users’ browsing experience on the web. This report measures all three core web vitals and reports the real-world information instead of the lab data which is very useful.

Chrome DevTools: Chrome DevTools is great for website owners to find and restore visual instability or unexpected layout shifts issues present on the web page. The investigation for such issues on the pages can be done from the new experience section in the performance panel of the tool. It also calculates TBT or Total Blocking Time, which can assist in improving FID.

Web Vitals Extension: Web Vitals Extension for Chrome measures all three core web vitals: LCP, FID, and CLS in real-time.

Google Search Console: The tools discussed above lack one thing or another that prevents them from being labeled as a one-stop solution for rectifying all the user-experience related issues. This is where the Google Search Console comes in. It has a lot of features that can assist in the foolproof improvement of page experience. The tool analyzes every page of the website and detects the ones that are having problems related to LCP, FID, or CLS metrics. It also lists out the opportunities for improvement to allow website owners and developers to implement necessary solutions.

All three core web vitals can be evaluated in Javascript by using standard web APIs. The web-vitals JavaScript library is the most simple way to calculate each metric of core web vitals. Measuring each metric with web-vitals JavaScript library is as simple as calling a single function:

import
{
"getCLS"
,
" getFID"
,
" getLCP"
}
" from"
'
web-vitals
'
;
function
" sendToAnalytics"
(
"metric"
)
{
const
" body "
=
" JSON"
.
stringify
(
"metric"
)
;
// Use `navigator.sendBeacon()` if available, falling back to `fetch()`.
(
"navigator"
.
"sendBeacon"
&&
" navigator"
.
"sendBeacon"
(
'
/analytics
'
,
"body"
)
)
||
"fetch"
(
'
/analytics
'
,
{
"body"
,
"method"
:
'
POST
'
,
"keepalive"
:
true
}
)
;
}
" getCLS"
(
"senToAnalytics"
)
;
" getFID"
(
"senToAnalytics"
)
;
" getLCP"
(
"sendToAnalytics"
)
;

However, it’s recommended to go with the six tools and extensions mentioned above so that you don’t have to pull any extra effort in writing codes.

The next important thing to discuss is- how optimized images improve the core web vitals of a website and SEO. Let’s discuss this.

How Optimized Images Improve Core Web Vitals and SEO

The most important thing for improving the page experience quality of a website is image optimization. The large image placed on the homepage of a website is often the LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) and if it’s not optimized, then it will affect the LCP score because of slow loading. It will not serve a good user experience and it will rank lower in Google’s SEO ranking.

In image optimization, the objective should always be to compress images to the right size and right format without affecting the quality of the image. Optimized images not only improves the loading time of a web page but also provides the much-needed SEO advantage. Implementing next-gen image formats like AVIF and WebP can be observed during image optimization as these formats bring the best quality in while keeping images at a small size. The good news is that the majority of the popular browsers extend support to these modern formats.

All three core web vitals have one single objective: to improve the page experience factor by focusing on the website’s speed and performance, and optimized images are the best solution to gain the advantage.

Developers or web content managers often fail to find the balance in size and format while optimizing the images. This problem will not longer be a hurdle when the companies will optimize for the core web vitals. For this purpose, the experienced development team at ImageEngine can provide a wide range of robust solutions for optimizing images. The ImageEngine team puts an image CDN service into the web application that takes care of converting the images to next-gen image formats (having the best quality at low size) like WebP, AVIF, etc. and then serves them to popular browsers.

Wrapping it Up: How ImageEngine will Help Boost SEO

ImageEngine optimizes web images to provide companies of all sizes with a competitive SEO advantage. The in-house experts at ImageEngine understand how Google’s search engine behaves and interprets the image when ranking the URLs.

ImageEngine’s image CDN service reduces the loading time of the website, which initiates a string of events. When the site performance and speed are elevated, then the bounce rates are reduced. It’s important to control the bounce rates because, according to Google, if the loading time is increased from 1 second to 3 seconds, then the bounce rate will shoot up to 32%. Also, if the loading time is increased from 1 second to 6 seconds, then the bounce rate will jump to 106%. This is bad not only for your business but for search engine ranking also. Once the bounce rates are under control, then the website engagement and user experience progress to improve the probability of additional conversions.

The end result is a more successful business as well as a better ranking on the search engine. This is what the team at ImageEngine strives to achieve so that your eCommerce business grows with a perfect blend of technology and experience.

Did you know that Google's Web Dev community rated us as a top Image CDN in their Tooling Report?

More articles you may be interested in.


>